Forbes
    All case studies
    CASE STUDY · Bookio × Elevon

    Bookio's Team Left With One Prompt That Replaces Ten

    The team already used AI, everyone differently and nobody sure what they were allowed to paste in. One day, four blocks and six hands-on exercises turned ad-hoc prompting into a method the whole team shares.

    Client

    Bookio

    Industry

    IT & software

    Solution

    AI Academy, one-day workshop

    Deployment

    On site, Slovak or English

    Participants work on their own tasks, on their own tools. What they build during the day is what they use the next morning.

    01
    The Starting Point

    The Starting Point

    The team was already using AI. Everyone in their own way, in a different tool, and nobody was confident about what they were allowed to paste into it.

    That produced three concrete problems. The same task returned different quality depending on who wrote the prompt. Nobody could say which data may go into a public tool and which may not. And people kept rewriting the same prompt from scratch instead of building it properly once.

    The goal was not to teach the team that AI exists. It was to move them from ad-hoc prompting to a repeatable method that produces the same quality regardless of who is at the keyboard.

    02
    How the Day Was Built

    How the Day Was Built

    Four blocks, each pairing a short explanation with an exercise done on the participant's own tool and own task.

    01

    Foundations, including the cost of a token

    How a model generates rather than retrieves, what a token is and why Slovak text costs more than English, which data never leaves the company, and what each of the four common tools is actually good for.

    02

    One composition framework

    Role, goal, context, instructions, format. Participants watch a single example move from a bad prompt to a professional one, then turn it into something that runs on a single word.

    03

    Security practised, not lectured

    Participants try to break their own agent with prompt injection and mostly succeed on the third attempt. Then they write a real work email with sensitive data masked. A rule you have tried once holds better than a rule in a policy document.

    Exercise one is designed to go badly. The framework that fixes it comes afterwards, and that order is the difference between hearing about it and being able to use it.

    03
    Six Exercises

    Six Exercises

    Write a prompt however it comes to you, then rewrite it using the composition framework, then turn it into something that runs on a single word. Three exercises that move a participant from a one-off request to a reusable tool.

    Then try to break your own agent, write a real work email with AI, and finally write it again with sensitive data masked. The order is deliberate and cannot be rearranged without losing the effect.

    What this looks like in practice

    Block four draws the line participants most often get wrong: where a good prompt stops being enough and the task needs a workflow, retrieval over company documents, or an agent with access to real systems.

    04
    What the Team Took Away

    What the Team Took Away

    What a team has after one day, measured by what they can do the next morning without asking anyone.

    One structured prompt template that gets filled in per task and reused, instead of rewriting from scratch

    Three things that never go into a public tool, plus a masking technique for when real content is needed

    A decision rule for tool choice: which one suits long documents, sourced research, or working inside an existing toolset

    The ability to tell a task a prompt solves from one that needs a workflow or company data

    The same output quality across the team, regardless of who writes the prompt

    Participants worked on tasks that were waiting for them the next day, not on a training scenario. That is why the prompts survived the workshop.

    05
    Why It Worked

    Why It Worked

    Mistake before instruction. The first exercise is meant to disappoint, and only then comes the framework that fixes it. Teams that are shown the answer first tend to nod along and change nothing.

    Security was practised as a habit rather than delivered as a list of prohibitions. Masking data on a real email takes two minutes and sticks, where a policy document is read once and forgotten.

    A trainer with operational background changed what could be answered. Questions like what if our data sits in an internal system got a concrete answer in the room, not a pointer to documentation.

    Want a similar transformation in your organization?

    Let's talk about how Elevon can help your team too.

    Book consultation
    Contact us
    Contact us

    We use essential and analytics cookies by default to ensure proper functionality and understand site usage. Marketing cookies are off unless you opt in. Privacy Policy